Evaluation of DP












            ******************************************************************************************

            *
            ******************************************************************************************
            Under the Higher Education Act, public higher education institutions are, within the scope

            governance, obliged to carry out internal evaluation of the quality of education, research
            activities that they organise. The evaluation of degree programmes (DP) is a vital part of
            evaluation system as it ensures the maintenance of a high standard of education at CU. The

            evaluation process is based on three pillars:

            • Dialogue

            • Awareness and formative feedback
            • Continuity and long-term care





            *=========================================================================================
            * Dialogue
            *=========================================================================================

            The evaluation process takes the form of a dialogue between the guarantor of the degree pr
            representatives of the faculty, on the one hand, and the Internal Evaluation Board (IEB) o
            This dialogue is conducted through, inter alia, a Self-Evaluation Report prepared by the g

            a Report on the Evaluation of the Degree programme, which is ultimately prepared by the IE
            of the dialogue is to jointly evaluate the progress of the realisation of a previously acc
            programme.





            *=========================================================================================
            * Awareness and formative feedback
            *=========================================================================================

            The evaluation dialogue should be based on data that provide information about the functio
            degree programme. Where possible, the Self-Evaluation Report must therefore, to a certain 
            form of comments on the data-based materials consisting of, on the one hand, information r

            University's information systems and, on the other, student opinions gathered from annual 
            surveys.




            *=========================================================================================

            * Continuity and long-term care
            *=========================================================================================
            The evaluation process is not intended to be a one-off act, or even an end in itself, but 

            component of the long-term care for the quality of the degree programme – one that is cont
            incorporates a number of other elements, be they at faculty or pan-university level. The g
            evaluation, carried out through the dialogue between the Internal Evaluation Board and the

            degree programme and any other representatives is to verify that the standard of realisati
            programme corresponds to the requirements of Charles University and identify the strengths
            of the degree programme, and to formulate recommendations for its further development and 


            Page Admin: Václav Műller